Re: Sara Paculdo participant in the Greener Gadget Design Competition “Fastronauts”, Patent Pending
As soon as these Fastronauts are available I am going to by a few for my five year old son. I think the concept is an ingenious one! A toy that addresses Gross and Fine Motor Skills is a crucial part of brain development. The green aspect as an integral part of toy design will be a guaranteed “Trend Setter”. This product with its form, color and function is a winner with my son. He carries the pictures around with him in anticipation.
Dear Greener Gadgets: I have just “discovered” you and I am thankful to the Tribewanted site, and Kaz, who has linked you to the site,(http://www.tribewanted.com/users/259/blogs/2154) for diffusing the knowledge of Greener Gadgets.
I am now reading about each of the entries for 2009, and it has given me great insight into what eco-minded gifted people are up to, bringing the world closer to zero-cost to the environment-energy for the world. Many thanks for your fantastic endeavors.
The Greener Gadgets design Competition Voting is REALLY NOT intuitive. You guys never mention that a simple click means voting that you like the gadget. Voting on the internet is usually done by a rating system, where you can also express if you don’t like something.
I clicked on the vote button hoping to have the opportunity to rate the gadget I was reviewing, and when I wanted to give a low score to the ‘bug plug’ I ended up voting for it. Sorry guys. I have a suspicion that I am not the only one. A rating system works just a bit better. I doubt that your winners based on the on-line voting are true winners. Total bummer.
Is there a site or store where green gadgets can be available to consumers as an alternative? I was reading awhile ago about the checktap, a power saving powerbar, but nothing seems to be easily accessible to purchase.
Where are the comments section? Last year you could add comments and discussion to each of the entries. I thought that was a great feature. Bring it back!
I’m watching 2 or 3 designs collect 2000+ votes over night? Clearly some are finding a way around voting just once. If I understand correctly, this determines the finalists – a public vote. Shouldn’t it be watched closer so that padding votes cannot happen?
And now, less than 12 hours after the last comment, this design has over TWELVE THOUSAND votes?! It’s very upsetting to watch the hard work of so many talented young people be displaced by a few who don’t appear to be playing fair!
We are looking into the possibility of fraudulent votes and all information we gather will be taken into account before finalists move to the next round.
Public voting will be a contributing factor to the designs mentioned on stage at the live competition on February 25, but will not decide the final winner.
You should so something with the fact that an 11 year old submitted to the competition—fantastic to showcase kids that age who show such awareness and creativity!
[...] tech reporter Martin LaMonica hosted a panel at the “Sustainable Planet” zone entitled Making Electronics Greener One Consumer at a Time. On the panel were Jeff Omelchuck, executive director of EPEAT; Jason Linnell, the executive [...]
[...] tech reporter Martin LaMonica hosted a panel at the “Sustainable Planet” zone entitled Making Electronics Greener One Consumer at a Time. On the panel were Jeff Omelchuck, executive director of EPEAT; Jason Linnell, the executive [...]
22 Comments
Re: Sara Paculdo participant in the Greener Gadget Design Competition “Fastronauts”, Patent Pending
As soon as these Fastronauts are available I am going to by a few for my five year old son. I think the concept is an ingenious one! A toy that addresses Gross and Fine Motor Skills is a crucial part of brain development. The green aspect as an integral part of toy design will be a guaranteed “Trend Setter”. This product with its form, color and function is a winner with my son. He carries the pictures around with him in anticipation.
Keep up the good work!!!
Dear Greener Gadgets: I have just “discovered” you and I am thankful to the Tribewanted site, and Kaz, who has linked you to the site,(http://www.tribewanted.com/users/259/blogs/2154) for diffusing the knowledge of Greener Gadgets.
I am now reading about each of the entries for 2009, and it has given me great insight into what eco-minded gifted people are up to, bringing the world closer to zero-cost to the environment-energy for the world. Many thanks for your fantastic endeavors.
The Greener Gadgets design Competition Voting is REALLY NOT intuitive. You guys never mention that a simple click means voting that you like the gadget. Voting on the internet is usually done by a rating system, where you can also express if you don’t like something.
I clicked on the vote button hoping to have the opportunity to rate the gadget I was reviewing, and when I wanted to give a low score to the ‘bug plug’ I ended up voting for it. Sorry guys. I have a suspicion that I am not the only one. A rating system works just a bit better. I doubt that your winners based on the on-line voting are true winners. Total bummer.
Absolutely amazing idea.. what better way to encourage greener thinking??
When will the winner be announced??
Is anyone selling the mini solar toy car? Where are you buying them. I would like to place an order to sell in the U.S.
Great Stuff..
Keep Your Good Work Going..
Regards!
Boblee
Processor
Is there a site or store where green gadgets can be available to consumers as an alternative? I was reading awhile ago about the checktap, a power saving powerbar, but nothing seems to be easily accessible to purchase.
I love the idea of green gadgets, great site.
Looks like a great conference. What is the date for 2010?
Excellent devices! They will help us to save up the nature and ecology
This is good motivation for people to put on their thinking hats and come up with a lot of ideas that can save mother earth.
The solar power blinds look like a really good idea and will definitely be possible with some of the new materials coming out.
The 2010 conference will be held on February 25.
Where are the comments section? Last year you could add comments and discussion to each of the entries. I thought that was a great feature. Bring it back!
How long do we have to vote?
Voting is scheduled to end Friday, February 12!
I’m watching 2 or 3 designs collect 2000+ votes over night? Clearly some are finding a way around voting just once. If I understand correctly, this determines the finalists – a public vote. Shouldn’t it be watched closer so that padding votes cannot happen?
And now, less than 12 hours after the last comment, this design has over TWELVE THOUSAND votes?! It’s very upsetting to watch the hard work of so many talented young people be displaced by a few who don’t appear to be playing fair!
Is this a Global competition?
Some gadgets are not applicable in all countries.
Are there more than ONE finalists anticipated??
We are looking into the possibility of fraudulent votes and all information we gather will be taken into account before finalists move to the next round.
Public voting will be a contributing factor to the designs mentioned on stage at the live competition on February 25, but will not decide the final winner.
Thanks!
What a mess. The votes were gamed and don’t reflect the entry merits.
You should so something with the fact that an 11 year old submitted to the competition—fantastic to showcase kids that age who show such awareness and creativity!
What a great idea. I know that I would to buy /support our local farmers!
3 Trackbacks/Pingbacks
[...] [...]
[...] tech reporter Martin LaMonica hosted a panel at the “Sustainable Planet” zone entitled Making Electronics Greener One Consumer at a Time. On the panel were Jeff Omelchuck, executive director of EPEAT; Jason Linnell, the executive [...]
[...] tech reporter Martin LaMonica hosted a panel at the “Sustainable Planet” zone entitled Making Electronics Greener One Consumer at a Time. On the panel were Jeff Omelchuck, executive director of EPEAT; Jason Linnell, the executive [...]